Request > Site-specific conservation objectives

Blueprint for site-specific conservation objectives for Marine Natura 2000 sites in the European sea basins

Summary

 

Type of request: Knowledge Synthesis

The aim of the request is to create a blueprint for drafting site-specific conservation objectives for marine habitats and species, taking into consideration the existing Commission’s guidance on this matter for the member states. The request would contribute to effectively protecting marine habitats and species by defining their objectives and thereby facilitating the setting of the right conservation measures which should lead to the improvement of marine biodiversity.

Requester:  European Commission’s Directorate-General for Environment (EC – DG ENV)

 

 

Funder:  EU Horizon Europe project “Connecting biodiversity knowledge and decision-making” – BioAgora.  BioAgora will develop the architecture and functionality of the new European “Science Service for Biodiversity” that will fully support the ecological transition required by the European Green Deal and the EU’s Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.

Expert Working Group
  • Anthony Ndah – Sol-Consulting, Co-chair.
  • Samantha Garrard – Plymouth Marine Laboratory, UK, Co-chair.
  • Andrea Cervantes – Coalition Clean Baltic (CCB), Sweden.
  • Charlotte HopkinsUniversity of Hull, UK.
  • Constance SchéréGoBe Consultants (APEM Group)/King’s College London, UK.
  • David BaileyUniversity of Glasgow, UK.
  • Jade BermanNational Trust, UK.
  • Leonardo TunesiISPRA – Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, Italy.
  • Natasha Walker-MilneUniversity of Glasgow, UK.
  • Oche OtorkpaNational Institute for Environmental Health (NIEH).
  • Renato Mamede – Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Averio, Portugal.
  • Senem Onen Tarantini University of Salento, Italy.
  • Vânia Sofia Serrão de Sousa University of Algarve, Portugal.
  • Vasiliki MarkantonatouUniversity of the Aegean, Greece.
Methods Expert Group (MEG)
  • Josie Antonucci di Carvalho – Eklipse MEG Focal point, Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity – HIFMB/AWI.Germany-.
  • Spyridoula Ntemiri – Eklipse MEG Co-chair, Green Fund, Greece.
Knowledge Coordination Body (KCB) focal points
  • Maud Borie – Eklipse KCB Focal point, King’s College London.
  • Olga Ameixa – Eklipse KCB Focal point, University of Aveiro and Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM).
  • Jan-Claas Dajka – Eklipse KCB, Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity, University of Oldenburg (HIFMB).
  • Nils Bunnefeld – Eklipse KCB Co-chair, University of Sterling.
  • Ute Jacob – Eklipse KCB Co-chair, Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity, University of Oldenburg (HIFMB).
Eklipse Management Body (EMB) contact points
  • Marie Vandewalle – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental research (UFZ), Germany.
Final outputs

Document of Work (DoW)

The Birds and Habitats Directives (BHD) require designation and effective management of Natura 2000 sites (special protection areas -SPAs under the Birds Directive and special areas of conservation -SACs under the Habitats Directive) as the main contribution to reaching and maintaining the favourable conservation status of protected habitats and species. Member States must establish site-specific conservation objectives for species and habitats protected in the sites, as well as establish and implement the necessary
conservation measures to reach those objectives. The site-specific conservation objectives should be based on scientific assessments that consider the ecological needs of species and habitats, their current status and threats. Clear measurable targets should be defined to guide targeted conservation actions. Despite existing guidance provided by the Commission on setting site-specific conservation objectives, they are still widely lacking in particular for marine habitats and species. This indicates the difficulty faced by Member States to formulate the objectives which adequately reflect the ecological requirements of the species, their current status and potential threats. In addition to compliance issues, this is also limiting the potential of the sites to stop and reverse the biodiversity loss and to reach the relevant EU and global targets. It is therefore essential to provide further support to Member States in setting scientifically sound site conservation objectives. This request would require the gathering of knowledge on the main ecological requirements, current status and potential threats for the marine habitats and species covered by Annex I of the Birds Directive and Annexes I and II of the Habitats Directive (full list in the Annex).

It should then define the blueprint for drafting site-specific conservation objectives, taking into account the existing Commissions guidance on this matter. Such a blueprint could be provided at sea-basin level and should be done for each habitat type and species, with a possibility to provide further break-down into sub-types of habitats or to group certain species with very similar ecological requirements. Ultimately the goal is to use this knowledge to assist Member States to set the appropriate site-specific conservation objectives for their marine habitats and species which fulfill the required legal standard and facilitate the establishment and implementation of the necessary conservation measures.

Summary of the request submitted through the KCBD’s Ticketing system

Timeline
  • Date request received by the EC Knowledge Centre for Biodiversity (KCBD): 15th of July 2024
  • Intake meeting by BioAgora with the requesters: 25th of September 2024
  • Kickoff meeting by Eklipse Scoping Group: 18th of November 2024
  • Request reformulation meeting with the requesters and Eklipse Scoping Group: 5th of March 2025
Scoping phase

The scoping phase is a major step within the Eklipse process. It aims to refine the question, identify how Eklipse could provide added value by being involved, seek knowledge and expertise on the refined question via an open Call for Knowledge (CfK), and provide suggestions regarding methods and resources needed to answer the request. The scoping phase of the request ends with the development of the Document of Work (DoW) ready to be reviewed by the requesters.